On this episode of Registry Matters, we dive into a range of critical topics affecting registrants and broader legal landscapes. We explore potential constitutional challenges to travel reporting requirements for PFRs, examining their implications on free speech and personal rights. Next, we dissect a recent Massachusetts case that highlights the complexities and challenges of risk-based registration systems for offenders. We also analyze a controversial California Supreme Court decision allowing a convicted sex offender to live near a home school, raising important questions about community safety and legal precedents. Finally, we address a voicemail that challenges misconceptions about sex offender registries while touching on the interplay of political figures and voter responsibility.

[00:00] Introduction
[3:10] Government restrictions on travel questioned
[13:35] Risk assessments impact PFR classification
[37:38] Controversial decision for community safety
[46:06] Laws about registration should change

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm328-a-double-edged-sword-risk-based-classifications-and-public-perception
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/6FnxwAQm57
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag:
https://fypeducation.org/shop/

Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/registry-matters/id1305039280
Google Play Music: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Icuxbpzvyti7wtoredipbtiojqy
RSS: https://www.registrymatters.co/feed/podcast/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3d75P7Kc37n2l79m89F9KI
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/registrymatters