[7:05] Robert, wrote a letter asking if a 2004 court order, which omitted mention of probation, supersedes his 2002 plea agreement that included indefinite supervised probation. The response clarified that a plea agreement is a binding contract, and the state can correct clerical errors even after many years. Therefore, Robert’s probation condition remains enforceable, and any attempt to contest it could lead to scrutiny and potential correction of the record.
[11:43] Joe Doe, representing himself and others, filed a lawsuit against Davies County Attorney John Berlou in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The case challenges Kentucky Senate Bill 249, which requires registrants who committed offenses against minors to use their full legal name on social media, retroactively applying to all registrants. Doe claims this law violates his First Amendment rights to anonymous speech and is overbroad. Doe sought a preliminary injunction and class certification, while Berlou sought summary judgment. The court granted the preliminary injunction, finding Doe likely to succeed on the merits and that his First Amendment rights were threatened. The case is handled by attorney Guy Hamilton Smith.
[17:40] The discussion revolves around Chevron deference, a legal principle where courts defer to government agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous laws if reasonable. The principle is crucial for efficient governance as agencies have expertise. Despite concerns about eroding democratic accountability and consistency, Chevron deference ensures agencies operate within legislative frameworks. The conversation also touches on the misconception that federal law alone mandates sex offender registration, clarifying that state laws are the primary drivers, with states retaining significant control over their registries.
[35:23] Sheriff Thomas Hanna of Sedgwick County, Colorado, sexually assaulted an intellectually disabled prisoner during transport. The Tenth Circuit ruled that the county could be liable since Hanna’s actions, although outside official policy, occurred during his official duties. A jury awarded $8.25 million in damages, and the case was sent back to determine the county’s responsibility for the payment.
[51:00] An individual is concerned about selling a car registered to her incarcerated husband, who is on a sex offender registry. Despite police and state registry officials indicating that the car can only be removed from the registry in person by her husband, the suggestion is to sell the car, cancel the registration with the DMV, and let her husband update his registry details upon release.
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/6FnxwAQm57
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/registry-matters/id1305039280
Google Play Music: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Icuxbpzvyti7wtoredipbtiojqy
RSS: https://www.registrymatters.co/feed/podcast/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3d75P7Kc37n2l79m89F9KI
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/registrymatters
The Registry Matters Podcast’s mission is to cover issues surrounding the Registry. We cover cases that will peel back the veneer of what we need to do to change our lives for the better. We cover news articles that spark conversations about the total insanity of this modern day witch hunt. This podcast will call out bad policy and call out those that are making bad policy.
To change things for the positive, we need to act. We are 6-7-8-900k strong. With that many people, plus their friends and family, over a million people are affected by the registry. We should be able to secure donations to hire lawyers and lobbyists to move the agenda in our favor. We need our people to be represented.