Here’s episode 231, recorded on July 2, 2022. We cover a case called May versus Shinn. This is a very sad case from Arizona, involving burden shifting. May and his family are friends of the movement. We also cover a case from the 7th Circuit that affirms GPS monitoring for people no longer under supervision. They said it’s “OK”.
[13:33] May vs Shinn [34:37] Braam, Antrim, Olszewski v Carrhttps://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Seventh-Circuit-Ruling-on-GPS-6-21-22.pdf
https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm231-seventh-circuit-affirms-post-supervision-lifetime-gps-in-wisconsin/
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RegistryMatters
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/6FnxwAQm57
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/registry-matters/id1305039280
Google Play Music: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Icuxbpzvyti7wtoredipbtiojqy
RSS: https://www.registrymatters.co/feed/podcast/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3d75P7Kc37n2l79m89F9KI
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/registrymatters
david
July 9, 2022 3:47 pmI have a question…Braam is quoted as saying he pays $240/month for his GPS. And i’m pretty sure that’s the going rate here in the badger state. Why is that not an issue? Isn’t that a punitive amount to pay?
Thanks, as always, for the excellent service you provide!