WI v Norma Grace Constantineau ( NO POSTING BY COPS W\OUT PROCESS – mentioned in Smith V Doe03) Yes they most certainly will issue arrest warrants for FailureToRgister. It will take a while to arrest you though. I’ve been arrested seven times for failure to register, but only actually convicted one time of that charge. I tend to chuck my registration form in file 13 and forget about it. I find what happens after arrest to be cathartic and always demand trial. As far as I’m concerned they have to prove it to a jury. Good thing for me there is no formal record required registration & state has no standardized waiver of right in the criminal file in 1992CR74. (The CR stands for child rape.) A rape i didnt do and said so then. These facts become clear in the provided preliminary hearing. State always uses the judgment paper, and has the courts Commissioner recognize it but leave out the lack of paperwork stating the life term. So WI Agent is as Larry says here ~35.05 “..acting on an imaginary problem… My 1st question to agent in preliminary hearing” WHAT CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF THIS DEFENDANT DID YOU YOURSELF ACTUALLY WITNESS.” Agent can only answer in the negative ” nothing” outside the conviction
He\she can never say they personally witnessed the qualifying trial. That fact drags the original case into the question. Do we convict people of prison escape with paper proof they were supposed to be locked up? That is the moral question tor the jury when faced with an Agent with no factual proof of registration obligations nor waiver of right. Which all in all represents WHY the Supreme Court took the unusual tact in Connecticut DPS to mention the substantive due process claim in a case put forth entirely on “procedural claims.” They DPS Court were putting emphasis on the standard waiver.