- The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that a person convicted of multiple counts of possession of child pornography in a single case does not have to register for life under the state’s sex offender registration statute.
- The court found that the phrase “separate occasions” in the statute refers to separate incidents or times at which an event occurred. In this case, the five convictions all occurred during the same hearing, so they did not meet the definition of “separate occasions.”
- The court’s ruling means that Corey Rector, the man who challenged the statute, will not have to register for life and will not be subject to lifetime GPS monitoring.
- The state of Wisconsin argued that the court’s interpretation of the statute was too narrow and that it would allow sex offenders to avoid lifetime registration even if they had committed serious offenses. However, the court rejected this argument, stating that it was bound by the plain meaning of the statute.
- The court’s ruling is significant because it could affect the outcome of other cases involving sex offenders who have been convicted of multiple counts in a single case. It could also lead to changes in the state’s sex offender registration statute.
Here are some additional points that were raised in the text:
- The state’s attorney general had previously issued an opinion that multiple convictions in the same case require lifetime GPS monitoring. However, the court found that this opinion was not binding.
- The court’s ruling was not unanimous. Two justices dissented, arguing that the court’s interpretation of the statute was too narrow and that it would allow sex offenders to avoid lifetime registration even if they had committed serious offenses.
- The court’s ruling was met with mixed reactions. Some people praised the court for its decision, while others criticized the ruling as being too lenient on sex offenders.
https://captimes.com/news/community/wisconsin-supreme-court-ruling-gives-hope-to-offenders-on-lifetime-gps/article_2b054c54-1860-5761-93ff-cc04f1395719.html
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RegistryMatters
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/6FnxwAQm57
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/registry-matters/id1305039280
Google Play Music: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Icuxbpzvyti7wtoredipbtiojqy
RSS: https://www.registrymatters.co/feed/podcast/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3d75P7Kc37n2l79m89F9KI
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/registrymatters
The Registry Matters Podcast’s mission is to cover issues surrounding the Registry. We cover cases that will peel back the veneer of what we need to do to change our lives for the better. We cover news articles that spark conversations about the total insanity of this modern day witch hunt. This podcast will call out bad policy and call out those that are making bad policy.
To change things for the positive, we need to act. We are 6-7-8-900k strong. With that many people, plus their friends and family, over a million people are affected by the registry. We should be able to secure donations to hire lawyers and lobbyists to move the agenda in our favor. We need our people to be represented.
DT
August 6, 2024 9:41 amI’m devastated by this action having been rewritten by Governor Evers. The Supreme Court ruled, my registry date went back to it’s originally intended end and then they just rewrote the law and it’s back to L-I-F-E. I sure hope people are fighting the good fight.
Pissed off anon
August 27, 2024 8:06 amYeah it’s funny how the DOC urged the legislature to rewrite the law bc this was going to affect their free cash gusher, so instead of looking at why, they made it look like the Supreme Court created a loophole, when really they were just undoing what Brad Schimmel did. Of course the DOC is going to request things that are in there best interest, but the way they keep going about it, circumventing the courts is just wrong